Kube 1.4 cherry picks#11709
Conversation
|
[test] |
|
[test] #10228 |
|
Evaluated for origin test up to b4597a4 |
|
continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/10956/) (Base Commit: 16306a6) |
1 similar comment
|
continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/10956/) (Base Commit: 16306a6) |
|
That additional commit LGTM. |
|
[merge] |
|
continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/10956/) (Image: devenv-rhel7_5300) |
|
Evaluated for origin merge up to b4597a4 |
|
It looks like we dropped the etcd3 perf changes... so, I would pretty much never recommend to go clientv3 then. /cc @mffiedler |
|
@timothysc dropped as in they used to be there and we accidentally removed them, or we didn't get around to pulling them in? |
|
@smarterclayton do you want upstream 35205 in? |
|
Both of the doubtful PRs are:
and I decided not to include them by default due to possible complications at this point in time. I'm leaving that decision to @smarterclayton about both of them. |
|
Pretty sure we need 35205 - is it a hard patch? On Nov 2, 2016, at 3:50 PM, Maciej Szulik notifications@github.com wrote: Both of the doubtful PRs are:
and I decided not to include them by default due to possible complications — |
|
Not sure if hard, but a big one. I'll give it a shot on my way to Brno. |
xref #11642
I've added a drop commit to fix the e2es panicking. We'll see how it goes.