Skip to content

Fix issues with bindings widget for service instances#2273

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
spadgett:is-bindable
Oct 17, 2017
Merged

Fix issues with bindings widget for service instances#2273
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
spadgett:is-bindable

Conversation

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett commented Oct 16, 2017

  • Don't show "Create Binding" when service instance is not bindable
  • Fix empty content when there are no bindings and you don't have
    permission to add a binding
  • Don't request all service classes and plans to show bindings. This is
    a large amount of data when we usually have the service class and plan
    already

Fixes #2271
Fixes #2270

- Don't show "Create Binding" when service instance is not bindable
- Fix empty content when there are no bindings and you don't have
  permission to add a binding
- Don't request all service classes and plans to show bindings. This is
  a large amount of data when we usually have the service class and plan
  already
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 16, 2017
@spadgett
Copy link
Member Author

spadgett commented Oct 16, 2017

@jeff-phillips-18 PTAL. I created a separate component for instance bindings because it simplifies the logic and isn't a lot of code. Let me know what you think.

@jeff-phillips-18
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 17, 2017
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic merge from submit-queue.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit f950d1c into openshift:master Oct 17, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants