Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @akaitsuki-ii, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on architectural improvements and dependency management within the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request primarily focuses on refactoring. It makes the vsa library an optional dependency, which is a great improvement for usability. The logic for generating attention keyword arguments has been moved from the configuration classes to the base pipeline class, which is a better design. Additionally, the parallel execution utility has been decoupled from specific model classes, improving modularity.
My review includes a couple of suggestions for further improvement:
- Making a hardcoded
patch_sizefor VSA configurable to improve flexibility. - Restoring a type hint in the parallel utility to maintain code clarity.
| attn_kwargs.update( | ||
| get_vsa_kwargs(latents.shape[2:], (1, 2, 2), self.config.attn_params.sparsity, device=self.device) | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The patch_size tuple (1, 2, 2) is hardcoded in the call to get_vsa_kwargs. This could lead to issues if a different model using Video Sparse Attention requires a different patch size. It would be more robust to make this value configurable, for instance by passing it as an argument to get_attn_kwargs from the specific DiT model that is being used.
No description provided.