Skip to content

[Feature] implement a more generic vault interface#9

Merged
jake-nyquist merged 4 commits intomainfrom
nyquist/hook-794-interface-for-vaults-that-is-not-erc-721
May 10, 2022
Merged

[Feature] implement a more generic vault interface#9
jake-nyquist merged 4 commits intomainfrom
nyquist/hook-794-interface-for-vaults-that-is-not-erc-721

Conversation

@jake-nyquist
Copy link
Contributor

In this PR, we add a more generic vault interface which allows the future creation of vaults that support other, non-ERC721 asset types.

We assume here that all asset types have an address, and leave it to the vault implementation to figure out if the vault includes the relevant assets.

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented May 4, 2022

Copy link
Contributor Author

jake-nyquist commented May 4, 2022


/// @dev these fields mark when there is an active entitlement on this contract. If these
/// fields are non-null, the beneficial owner is unable to withdrawl until either the entitlement
/// fields are non-null, the beneficial o wner is unable to withdrawl until either the entitlement
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lol

@jake-nyquist jake-nyquist force-pushed the 05-04-add_call_upgrader_role_to_the_protocol branch from e1b91ed to 9031bfc Compare May 9, 2022 12:52
@jake-nyquist jake-nyquist force-pushed the nyquist/hook-794-interface-for-vaults-that-is-not-erc-721 branch from 78f8725 to 142e189 Compare May 9, 2022 12:52
Copy link
Contributor Author

jake-nyquist commented May 10, 2022

Graphite Merge Job

Current status: ⛔ Merge stopped

This pull request was previously queued to merge as part of a stack. It could not be merged because optional checks are failing. To continue, please 1) fix the tests and start a new merge or 2) manually merge past the failing tests.

This comment was auto-generated by Graphite.

Job Reference: vU9gfbfglkDrEURuEos3

@jake-nyquist jake-nyquist changed the base branch from 05-04-add_call_upgrader_role_to_the_protocol to main May 10, 2022 19:19
@jake-nyquist jake-nyquist merged commit 1e3e4a8 into main May 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants