Skip to content

Converting pytest to pyrproject.toml#437

Merged
AlexanderLanin merged 1 commit intoeclipse-score:mainfrom
MaximilianSoerenPollak:MSP_move_pytest_to_pyproject
Mar 10, 2026
Merged

Converting pytest to pyrproject.toml#437
AlexanderLanin merged 1 commit intoeclipse-score:mainfrom
MaximilianSoerenPollak:MSP_move_pytest_to_pyproject

Conversation

@MaximilianSoerenPollak
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Description

Move pytest init configuration to pyproject.toml to enable testing from ref-integration

🚨 Impact Analysis

  • This change does not violate any tool requirements and is covered by existing tool requirements
  • This change does not violate any design decisions
  • Otherwise I have created a ticket for new tool qualification

✅ Checklist

  • Added/updated documentation for new or changed features
  • Added/updated tests to cover the changes
  • Followed project coding standards and guidelines

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 10, 2026

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run --lockfile_mode=error //src:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output
[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.3.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: dcfb6680-d141-4163-9ba1-220eca7ced88
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: src
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: src
Analyzing: target //src:license-check (1 packages loaded)
Analyzing: target //src:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //src:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (63 packages loaded, 9 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (68 packages loaded, 9 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (70 packages loaded, 9 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (76 packages loaded, 9 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (128 packages loaded, 1003 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (129 packages loaded, 2510 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (133 packages loaded, 2525 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (133 packages loaded, 2525 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (133 packages loaded, 2525 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (138 packages loaded, 4413 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (144 packages loaded, 4589 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //src:license-check (145 packages loaded, 4715 targets configured).
[12 / 16] [Sched] JavaToolchainCompileClasses external/rules_java+/toolchains/platformclasspath_classes
[14 / 16] JavaToolchainCompileBootClasspath external/rules_java+/toolchains/platformclasspath.jar; 0s disk-cache, processwrapper-sandbox
[15 / 16] Building src/license.check.license_check.jar (); 0s disk-cache, multiplex-worker
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //src:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/src/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/src/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 25.126s, Critical Path: 2.63s
INFO: 16 processes: 12 internal, 3 processwrapper-sandbox, 1 worker.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 16 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/src/license.check.license_check src/formatted.txt <args omitted>
usage: org.eclipse.dash.licenses.cli.Main [-batch <int>] [-cd <url>]
       [-confidence <int>] [-ef <url>] [-excludeSources <sources>] [-help] [-lic
       <url>] [-project <shortname>] [-repo <url>] [-review] [-summary <file>]
       [-timeout <seconds>] [-token <token>]

@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@AlexanderLanin AlexanderLanin merged commit 758c50e into eclipse-score:main Mar 10, 2026
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants