Skip to content

Comments

review: Transition flow#2245

Merged
renejeglinsky merged 6 commits intomainfrom
rjegl12/flowReview
Dec 4, 2025
Merged

review: Transition flow#2245
renejeglinsky merged 6 commits intomainfrom
rjegl12/flowReview

Conversation

@renejeglinsky
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@renejeglinsky renejeglinsky added the AI Review AI generated suggestions label Dec 3, 2025
@renejeglinsky renejeglinsky removed the AI Review AI generated suggestions label Dec 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here's a collaborative code review enhanced with AI insights. These suggestions are thoughtful recommendations rather than definitive requirements, so please apply what resonates with your project goals. You remain the expert decision-maker—AI simply offers additional perspective to support your development process.
Model: claude-sonnet-4-20250514 | Prompt Tokens: 2867 | Completion Tokens: 628

@renejeglinsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

How should this be understood then?
image

@sjvans
Copy link
Contributor

sjvans commented Dec 4, 2025

How should this be understood then? image

if you annotate the element with @flow.status (or @flow.status: true), you should also annotate the element with @readonly → fully manual mode

if you annotate the entity with @flow.status: XYZ, then the element XYZ is made read-only automatically

@renejeglinsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

Understood it now, thanks! Will think later about if I get an idea to simplify the text (so that I would get it on first read ;) )

@renejeglinsky renejeglinsky merged commit 7b130d1 into main Dec 4, 2025
8 checks passed
@renejeglinsky renejeglinsky deleted the rjegl12/flowReview branch December 4, 2025 12:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants