Add more sqllogictests for parquet_sorted_statistics

[yyy1000]

Which issue does this PR close?

Part of #10336 .

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?

Are there any user-facing changes?

[yyy1000]

I think it's better to push this though not finished to get early comments to better modify the code. 😀
Don't know whether I totally understand what #10336 (comment) and #9593 (comment) said.
And I'm also learning related code to better understand the background.

[alamb]

I think it's better to push this though not finished to get early comments to better modify the code. 😀

I agree -- thank you @yyy1000 -- I changed the description to reflect this

[alamb]

Thank you @yyy1000 -- I will review this more carefully in the next day or two
cc @suremarc

[comphead]

thanks @yyy1000 would you mind adding the description what exactly it tests, what is so outstanding in the output we looking for?

[yyy1000]

Sure, the test is mainly from #9593 (comment), I think it will test the case when schema and query order to verify sort preserving merge would not be used.
Will add the description soon.

[comphead]

I like it, but I'd say the test looks slightly confusing me as its not very clear what exactly the test is asserting, would be nice to have the test description