docs: Add Pro vs OSS comparison for cross-product risk acceptances#13703
Merged
valentijnscholten merged 4 commits intoDefectDojo:devfrom Dec 8, 2025
Merged
Conversation
paulOsinski
approved these changes
Nov 13, 2025
docs/content/en/working_with_findings/findings_workflows/risk_acceptances.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
mtesauro
approved these changes
Nov 14, 2025
Contributor
mtesauro
left a comment
mtesauro
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved.
Assuming @skywalke34 addresses the requested changes from @valentijnscholten
Contributor
|
@paulOsinski can you please assist @skywalke34 with this PR? |
paulOsinski
requested changes
Dec 1, 2025
docs/content/en/working_with_findings/findings_workflows/risk_acceptances.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Corrected risk acceptance scope at engagement level for OSS.
paulOsinski
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2025
Maffooch
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2025
docs/content/en/working_with_findings/findings_workflows/risk_acceptances.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
valentijnscholten
approved these changes
Dec 8, 2025
Maffooch
added a commit
to valentijnscholten/django-DefectDojo
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2026
…efectDojo#13703) * docs: Add Pro vs OSS comparison for cross-product risk acceptances * Update risk_acceptances.md - correct scope b/w Pro and OSS Corrected risk acceptance scope at engagement level for OSS. * Update docs/content/en/working_with_findings/findings_workflows/risk_acceptances.md --------- Co-authored-by: Paul Osinski <42211303+paulOsinski@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cody Maffucci <46459665+Maffooch@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
documentation update: Clarifying the differences between DefectDojo Pro and Open Source for cross-product risk acceptances. Specifically, Pro supports CVE-level risk acceptance across products while OSS only provides for product-level risk acceptances.