Conversation
Right now we test everything on c7a.metal-48xl, c6a.metal, c6a.4xlarge, c6a.2xlarge, c6a.xlarge, c6a.large, t3a.small, c8g.metal-48xl, c8g.4xlarge (9 machines). It's ok to submit some of them, as the result will be regenerated. |
|
@shehabgamin Before merging, I like to ask something. There was some earlier discussion about lukewarm vs. cold runs, please see #692 and the linked bug. I see that the Sail submission does this: server = SparkConnectServer()
server.start()
_, port = server.listening_addressin sail/query.py.
If the answer to 2. is "no", kindly adjust the script so it does true cold runs - thanks! (I already pushed a commit which removes the "lukewarm" tag). |
|
|
I updated the Sail submission: #698 |
|
@alexey-milovidov To update the json result files (9 files per system), I currently copy the output from play.clickhouse.com manually into the JSON files. This is too tedious. I see that you did large update PRs (e.g this this this) - are you using some extra automation which I could re-use as well? |
t3a.smallmachine. #593c8g.4xlargeresults file. If only four hardware configurations are allowed, would it be okay to removec6a.metalin favor ofc8g.4xlarge?cc @alexey-milovidov @rschu1ze